Exactly. Unintrusive AVG for me since early 2001. Never infected.PurpleSky said:norton is slightly better then mcafee but this never means that it is not bad. Norton is useless most of the time. Generates more problems then it fixes. McAfee is the same. On top of that McAfee annoys the heck out of user. I would prefer the virus in my system then having NAV or McAfee. So my vote is " pretty yes sugar on top "
I think not.hopper said:Exactly. Unintrusive AVG for me since early 2001. Never infected.
On the other hand, symantec users may find me ranting on symantec rather offensive and be eager to fire back with biased reasons why NAV doesn't suck. Therefore, your intellectual thoughts on this controversial topic being biased, are in fact false.Tumbleweed36 said:The premise of the original question suggests that Norton is not a great product. Therefore I doubt if the answers will reflect a true picture of what the product actually is because the original question plants a negative before the poll is taken. Therefore, negative responses are more likely to be answered in this poll. That is my two cents worth.