|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| General Computer Security Get Help With System Security - This forum is not for malware removal assistance. For malware removal assistance, read the sticky topic at the top of the Virus/Trojan/Spyware Help forum, or the "First Steps" link at the top right of each page. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
07-31-2009, 03:03 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 68
OS: xp sp2
|
is behaviour-based protection on its own enough?
apologies all round - i've asked the classic "which is better" question without thinking . I am thinking of getting rid of signature-based AV nowadays . From what i understand zero-day or short-lived threats are more common . So is a behaviour-based security prog going to give me enough protection ? I've used prevx and threatfire and drivesentry before and they all seem fine . I'm a pretty safe surfer- news and politics mainly- dvd covers downloaded occasionally . I'm interested in other people's thoughts about this . many thanks - cheers peter
|
|
     
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
