Glaswegian

Was Vista always the slow elevator to something better?

There is no getting away from it. Windows 7 was never intended to be launched this week, and would in more normal circumstances have appeared at some point next year or ever later.

What went wrong, why normality was disrupted, and why the world has been invited to experience the launch of something as technically opaque as an operating system, is now a matter of widely-held orthodoxy: Vista just didn't measure up, so XP, which should have been retired some years ago, still holds sway.

Launched to business customers throughout late 2006, the scale of Vista's market failure still looks bad, no matter that it has ended up maturing into a perfectly stable piece of software. According to a survey by Forrester this week, XP is still the main OS used on an astonishing 79 percent of PCs in the key US and European SMB sector, with Vista used by 9 percent, not much ahead of the aged Windows 2000.

The grip XP has maintained on businesses at all levels is still a shock if you ponder one of the main reasons it was supposed to deserve being kicked out - woeful security.

There was a time when security would have been seen as an afterthought and that was probably how XP's planners saw it as they churned through code in mid-2001, close to launch. That turned out to be historic complacency and so the whole OS had to be retrofitted with a security-oriented service pack in late 2004 just to turn it into something almost mediocre. XP has struggled security-wise ever since.


http://features.techworld.com/securi...lease/?olo=rss