Welcome to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft, Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your problem solved is as easy as:
1. Registering for a free account
2. Asking your question
3. Receiving an answer

Registered members:
* Get free support
* Communicate privately with other members (PM).
* Removal of this message
* See fewer ads.
* And much more..

 



Want to know how to post a question? click here Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps
Go Back   Tech Support Forum > The Relaxation Room > The Political Scene
User Name
Password
Site Map Register Donate Rules Blogs Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-05-2009, 08:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
TSF Enthusiast
 
djaburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,319
OS: XP SP3/Vista/7 Server 2K/2K3/2K8


Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

So it seems as if the Obama administration is backing away from their initial contention that illegals would not be receiving medical benefits they're not entitled to. How can you prevent it, if you can't verify it?


-----

Last week, the Senate Finance Committee wrapped up its consideration, or “mark up,” of its health care reform bill, the America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009. (Chairman’s Mark). During the mark up, the committee rejected two amendments that sought to enhance verification requirements for individuals who apply for taxpayer-subsidized health care benefits, as well as another amendment regarding federal benefits for legal aliens.

On Wednesday, September 30, Finance Committee Ranking Member Charles Grassley (R-IA) offered an amendment “that would require an applicant, or a parent or guardian of an applicant under 18, to present government-issued photo identification at the time of application for Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Program benefits.” (CQ Committee Coverage, September 30, 2009). In a statement on his amendment, Grassley asked the committee: “Is there any question that when you’re getting the benefit of a Children’s Health Insurance Program or Medicaid that there’s really nothing wrong with requiring a photo ID?…Shouldn’t we…care about people accessing thousands of dollars of government benefits through identity theft?” Well-known amnesty proponent Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) spoke against Senator Grassley’s amendment, arguing that the measure would create “a new barrier to coverage for everyone.” (CSPAN, September 30, 2009). The amendment was ultimately defeated on a party-line vote.
The entire article
__________________
Computers make it easier to do a lot of things, but most of the things they make it easier to do don't need to be done.

The inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery.
djaburg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Important Information
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free.

Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here

Old 10-05-2009, 09:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Asst Manager Hardware
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 19,650
OS: XP Professional


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Why is this a surprise? Every amendment that is brought up by Republicans is defeated on a party line vote and this is pretty evident from their discussion and subsequent voting along party lines.

They Democrats don't want to check because they know cheating will be rampant and if they put a check in, the illegal votes and voters go away and they lose votes to stay in office.

Change, real change!
__________________

----------
I don't receive email notifications of replies to subscribed threads. (Internet provider policy) Therefore, if I don't respond to your post within 24 hours, please send me a reminder PM and include the link to your thread.
Tumbleweed36 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:30 AM   #3 (permalink)
Asst. Manager, The Conversation Pit
 
yustr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Connecticut shore
Posts: 6,044
OS: XP Pro

My System

Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed36 View Post
Why is this a surprise? Every amendment that is brought up by Republicans is defeated on a party line vote and this is pretty evident from their discussion and subsequent voting along party lines.

They Democrats don't want to check because they know cheating will be rampant and if they put a check in, the illegal votes and voters go away and they lose votes to stay in office.

Change, real change!
Two points:

The committee spent months trying to forge a bill that had republican support, hundreds of hours of discussions, scores of meetings. Then when it came to a vote – exactly how many republicans voted for it? No they chose to fall on their sword to fight even a modest - PRO INSURANCE COMPANY bill. So before you rant about the dem's consider how your party handled themselves in this fiasco.

Verification was tried and resulted in thousands of American's being turned away but a miniscule number of illegals kept away. Emergency rooms would still have to take them – unless you’re suggesting that ID be required there too. Oops, no ID? Sorry, go die on the street. Now is that why the dems voted it down? You're probably a little right, the dems covet the hispanic citizen's vote...recall that illegals can't vote.
__________________
If there are lawyers or politicians involved, logic may be a very poor tool for reaching a conclusion.
yustr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
Manager, The Conversation Pit/Analyst, Security Team
 
bry623's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NW Territory circa 1787
Posts: 11,692
OS: winxp pro sp2


Send a message via MSN to bry623
Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Which is why they don't want the IDs. Come register to vote today, vote today and you won't need an ID............. BTW, who will they vote for? The people giving away "Oprah's favorite things".

Seriously, it is not that hard to get a state ID. Especially if by getting one, you are able to get so much more in return. It is such a fallacy to say that requiring an ID kills people.
__________________
"If you aren't a liberal when you're 20, you have no heart. If you aren't a conservative when you are 50, you have no brain"

bry623 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
Asst Manager Hardware
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 19,650
OS: XP Professional


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Quote:
Originally Posted by yustr View Post
you're probably a little right, the dems covet the hispanic citizen's vote...recall that illegals can't vote.
Hmm, you are correct, ever hear of ACORN?
__________________

----------
I don't receive email notifications of replies to subscribed threads. (Internet provider policy) Therefore, if I don't respond to your post within 24 hours, please send me a reminder PM and include the link to your thread.

Last edited by Tumbleweed36; 10-06-2009 at 07:52 AM.
Tumbleweed36 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 07:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
TSF Enthusiast
 
djaburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,319
OS: XP SP3/Vista/7 Server 2K/2K3/2K8


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Quote:
Originally Posted by yustr View Post
Now is that why the dems voted it down? You're probably a little right, the dems covet the hispanic citizen's vote...recall that illegals can't vote.
If only it were that easy. In my lovely state of CA, they have motor voter, which is a cute little phrase that allows people getting drivers licenses to register to vote at the same time. No proof of citizenship, no problem.
__________________
Computers make it easier to do a lot of things, but most of the things they make it easier to do don't need to be done.

The inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery.
djaburg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 01:41 PM   #7 (permalink)
TSF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 560
OS: XP Pro SP3


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed36 View Post
Hmm, you are correct, ever hear of ACORN?
Yes. Bold and italicized for effect. Fine. All voter registration fraud. No voter fraud. Illegals still can't vote.
Canaanabolaanan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 02:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Asst Manager Hardware
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 19,650
OS: XP Professional


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canaanabolaanan View Post
Yes. Bold and italicized for effect. Fine. All voter registration fraud. No voter fraud. Illegals still can't vote.
Unless of course they voted fraudulently via registration fraud. It will take years to find out who Acorn paid to vote in the last election. Don't bet that many illegal voters were registered to vote and actually did vote.

No verification of legality to vote, no fraud, is this correct??? We are not permitted (in some states) to verify your legallity, so come on in, vote early, vote often. No foul, just keep playing the game.

Just wanted to clarify that issue and wondered if you actually believe there were no illegals who voted in this last election.
__________________

----------
I don't receive email notifications of replies to subscribed threads. (Internet provider policy) Therefore, if I don't respond to your post within 24 hours, please send me a reminder PM and include the link to your thread.

Last edited by Tumbleweed36; 10-06-2009 at 02:22 PM.
Tumbleweed36 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 06:23 PM   #9 (permalink)
TSF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 560
OS: XP Pro SP3


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed36 View Post
Unless of course they voted fraudulently via registration fraud.
True. Which no charges have landed. Thus my initial statement.
Canaanabolaanan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 06:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
Asst Manager Hardware
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 19,650
OS: XP Professional


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canaanabolaanan View Post
True. Which no charges have landed. Thus my initial statement.
Which no charges have landed YET! Unfortunately, it will take nothing short of forever to assess these charges of registration fraud because there is so much of it to wade through. I guess we will see in time.

BTW Canaanabolaanan, I appreciate your way of thinking through posts and posting honest opinions, even if I don't always agree with your assessment. Cheers for that method, because we don't see that very often on this forum area.
__________________

----------
I don't receive email notifications of replies to subscribed threads. (Internet provider policy) Therefore, if I don't respond to your post within 24 hours, please send me a reminder PM and include the link to your thread.
Tumbleweed36 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 06:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Moderator Relaxation Room
 
Drew1369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 3,425
OS: Win7 Ultimate


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

No but charges are being filed against ACORN for voter registration fraud... so why do you support them?
__________________
We humans have a primal urge to kill because, thanks to natural selection, all the homo sapiens who didn't have a primal urge to kill, were themselves killed.

http://obamaclock.org/
Drew1369 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2009, 08:36 PM   #12 (permalink)
TSF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 560
OS: XP Pro SP3


Re: Senate Finance Committee Rejects Verification

I only support them in so much as I don't support lies about them. However, they seem to be a multi-faceted organization and I think it would be presumptuous to assume a whole bad bunch because of a few bad grapes.

They do (some) legitimate voter drives, in addition to cheap housing for low income workers. I don't think this is such a bad idea or program. But certainly their negative reputation and behavior does not bode well for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed36 View Post
1. Which no charges have landed YET! Unfortunately, it will take nothing short of forever to assess these charges of registration fraud because there is so much of it to wade through. I guess we will see in time.

2. BTW Canaanabolaanan, I appreciate your way of thinking through posts and posting honest opinions, even if I don't always agree with your assessment. Cheers for that method, because we don't see that very often on this forum area.
1. Well, I was trying to distinguish registration fraud from voter fraud. Registration fraud is signing up people who don't deserve to be signed up. Voter fraud is having actual unqualified persons voting, actually changing the vote count. Voter registration fraud is no meager offense, but that doesn't change elections. Voter fraud would be the biggy. And I don't recall hearing a whole lot of voter fraud cases even being brought up. I'm pretty sure it's voter reg. fraud. Perhaps there was a decent degree of this. But for election purposes, I think it's insignificant.

2. Thanks. I appreciate this. Politics isn't an easy topic to discuss, and it indeed can get me riled. Though I try to maintain a cool demeanor with thoughtful responses, and I'm glad I'm not seen (at least by all) as something of an ogre :)

Last edited by Canaanabolaanan; 10-06-2009 at 08:37 PM.
Canaanabolaanan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:20 AM.



Copyright 2001 - 2009, Tech Support Forum
Home Tips Plus | Outdoor Basecamp | Automotive Support Forum

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85