![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Manager, The Conversation Pit/Analyst, Security Team
|
Activist judges at again...
I know it is a CNN link (hopefull y will post something from fox), but a judge in Georgia struck down the gay marriage law on a point of law. I hope my state doesn't have any dumbass judges who who countermand the mandate of 3/4 of the people.
__________________
"If you aren't a liberal when you're 20, you have no heart. If you aren't a conservative when you are 50, you have no brain"
|
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Asst. Manager, The Conversation Pit
|
Quote:
But that's not really the issue. Read the ruling in GA again. It upheld the law in GA. It was the Legislature, who knew they were violating GA's Constitution, who are the activists (as they should be btw). It is NOT the role of judges to support the "mandate of 3/4 of the people". That is what elected officials are for. Judges rule on points of law. And if the "mandate" is contrary to law, the Judge must rule. Least we forget: a basic tennant of Democracy is that laws protect the minority FROM the majority. Prior to the 1960's it was illegal for whites and blacks to marry (among other things) in many States. That was the will of the people. The SCOTUS said basically that it doesn't matter what the majority want, its against the equal protection clause to allow that practise to continue. If left to legislatures alone do you really suppose the civil rights movement would have succeeded?
__________________
If there are lawyers or politicians involved, logic may be a very poor tool for reaching a conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|