![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your opinion? | |||
| Its the parents choice - no limit to changes made |
|
1 | 11.11% |
| Parents choice but limited to hair/eyes etc |
|
0 | 0% |
| No genetic changes allowed |
|
4 | 44.44% |
| We should still do more research |
|
4 | 44.44% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Will rule the World
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Elizabeth
Posts: 4,537
OS: XP SP3, Vista SP1, Windows 7 RC
|
Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
When a Los Angeles fertility clinic offered last month to let parents choose their kids' hair and eye color, public outrage followed. On March 2, the clinic shut the program down and that, says transhumanist author James Hughes, is a shame.
According to Hughes, using reproductive technologies in this case, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), in which doctors screen embryos before implanting them for cosmetic purposes is just an old-fashioned parental impulse, translated into 21st century technology......... http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2...nerdebate.html What is the opinion on this? I reckon gonna be split... |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Biker, Geek and Jock
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
Yay eugenics. Seriously, have people not learned? **** no, they shouldn't. The argument that women should be able to do so because "it's their body" is BS... It's not their body, it's their kid's body that they are changing.
Last edited by -=Rousseau=-; 03-17-2009 at 12:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Will rule the World
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Elizabeth
Posts: 4,537
OS: XP SP3, Vista SP1, Windows 7 RC
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
Its a very touchy subject...i think eventually we'll start understanding it a bit better and be able to eliminate major diseases and flaws, but when it starts to become a rich mans playground and the like, it becomes a problem. Eliminating possibly flawed genes that cause cancer, fine, rich kids, being better etc, no frikkin way!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,459
OS: Experimenter
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
So fact catches up to fiction, the movies becomes reality. Next stop, the Matrix.
__________________
Half viking, half pirate, stronger than both XP Repair Malware Removal Vista Repair Downgrade Vista |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Resident Village Idiot
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
As asidman says, it's a brilliant tool to diagnose the various genetic disorders that occur, as long as that's all it's used for. When it's used for what can only be called 'Parental Ego', then that crosses the line into dangerous areas.
We've only just scratched the surface of human genetics, any tinkering now can lead to heaven-knows-what, in generations to come.
__________________
![]() I shall meet all of my deadlines directly in proportion to the amount of bodily injury I could expect to receive from missing them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Moderator Relaxation Room
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 3,452
OS: Win7 Ultimate
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
Definitely needs more research before we can even touch the non detrimental subjects of the fetus (ie eye color, hair color etc...) HOWEVER I dont think that it should be used for this even if it is perfected.
but, if there is a chance to reduce the chance of things like downs syndrome I think there might be some merit to this...
__________________
We humans have a primal urge to kill because, thanks to natural selection, all the homo sapiens who didn't have a primal urge to kill, were themselves killed. http://obamaclock.org/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
Quote:
__________________
The greater your capacity to love, the greater your capacity to feel the pain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Will rule the World
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Elizabeth
Posts: 4,537
OS: XP SP3, Vista SP1, Windows 7 RC
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
Quote:
Whats happening with op? Happened yet??Is there an easy universal answer? I doubt it, but i still think the potential for good with this technology far outweighs any disadvantages, but like it was said, a line needs to be drawn, and regulations implemented. Specific advantages or cosmetic changes - Should not be allowed. Eliminating disease & genetic problems - Good, but like i read in an article, who says eliminating a genetic problem such as cancer, won't flip another switch that causes obesity. It boils down to the fact although we have mapped human genes etc, there is still a loooooooooooong way to go before we begin to grasp what we have discovered in the mysterious human gene. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,459
OS: Experimenter
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
I want my baby back baby back baby back...
__________________
Half viking, half pirate, stronger than both XP Repair Malware Removal Vista Repair Downgrade Vista |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
Quote:
You know something that I should NOT admit, but it has always been in the back of my mind, and I hate to say it, but related to the topic at hand, I have looked at my last 2 partners and said, "Would we have pretty babies?" With one, I knew the baby would be very tall, dark hair and blue eyes, but with the last one, it was a toss up... I won't go into further details, but I think women naturally gravitate toward the man who will produce the strongest child, and in strong, I don't mean physical strength, but in immunity, psychology and intelligence. And, of course tall, dark and handsome does not hurt:) I mean if I met some short, bald guy with bad eyes and a hair lip, gosh, do I really want a baby with that guy? Does that sound bad? Probably yes, but it is just the truth. Think about guys who donate their sperm. Those women want looks and intelligence and won't settle for below average sperm, right, so why should we with men? I guess the same goes for a man who is choosing a woman. He would want her to have the same strong characteristic traits, not someone who has a propensity for heart disease, diabetes, obesity, etc. Also, from what I understand, mixing races (which I think is fine morally) can also create a problem with certain diseases, blood donorship, etc. All for now.
__________________
The greater your capacity to love, the greater your capacity to feel the pain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,459
OS: Experimenter
|
Re: Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?
Hi lolarobot,
Good to see you are going to be able to keep in touch during this. We've continued to closed topic via pm. I think everyone is seeing eachs side clearly now. Are you going to have a good chance of site seeing while there? Or is it all via the hospital window?
__________________
Half viking, half pirate, stronger than both XP Repair Malware Removal Vista Repair Downgrade Vista |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|