![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,142
OS: xp
|
Confusing Words
Why does inflammable mean the same thing as flammable?
http://www.confusingwords.com/index.php inflammable able to be set aflame; easily excited or disturbed flammable able to be set aflame
__________________
![]() TSF has outgrown its server, again. Please help ![]() "Gutta cavat lapidem, non vi sed saepe cadendo" |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Troubled
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,038
OS: 2kpro/XP pro/MCE
|
the following is from memory in high school, ~ 27 years ago..
the original word was inflammable...but many people got confused about it, and thought that meant it was NOT flammable..so it was 'changed' to flammable...change being 'relative' of course...I guess it really means that now flammable is an 'acceptable' word for use (i.e. its in the dictionary)... the confusion arises from the 'in'...let's compare decent with indecent...decent means acceptable, indecent is the opposite... the root word that causes the 'confusion' is flame...many people who memorize the 'rules' of english mistook the use of 'in' to mean NOT flammable...they were not properly realizing that the real root of inflammable was/is inflame... as noted, the use of flammable is now 'accepted' and arises from the confusion of the 'in' Last edited by Wozer; 11-19-2006 at 09:33 AM. Reason: was/is |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Manager Emeritus, I'm blond, James Blond
|
Wozer is right. Copypasta from my dictionary:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,142
OS: xp
|
inflammable = flammable and the opposite is non flammable .
I think i got it now lol
__________________
![]() TSF has outgrown its server, again. Please help ![]() "Gutta cavat lapidem, non vi sed saepe cadendo" |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|