|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Protocols and Routing IP, IPX and other protocol support |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
03-31-2009, 12:52 AM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
OS: xp
|
Cisco NAT problem
i have a network NAT problem that i cant get to work and hopefully one of you can help me. This is the scenario
I have the network as shown in the diagram. The FIP polls to the terminal server on the first IP 10.212.16.140 which will use the primary link to get to the terminal server. If the primary link goes down, and the FIP cant get to the terminal server on the 10.212.16.140 ip address, it will poll the second iP 10.212.26.140 and this will use the serial link and via the 2nd router to get to the TS. Now the TS has only one IP (10.212.16.140 )address and no gateway. How can we get NAT to work in such a scenario? i have attached the diagram. any help? can anyone do a config of this? |
|
     
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
04-01-2009, 06:36 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 177
OS: XP / 2K3 / RHE / HP-UX
|
Re: Cisco NAT problem
Is this a production setup or for school? Can't you drop 20 bucks and multihome the Terminal Server?
You're completely layer 2 in a single flat subnet behind both routers. This is obviously not ideal. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
