![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Networking Support General Networking Support Forum |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
OS: Vista Ultimate
|
Poor network performance (x-over cable/FTP)
HI Guys
im trying to get HD stuff to stream and its jerky as hell so, in order to rule out the network I dropped back to a x-over ethernet cable with the server direct to a device (I tried a laptop and a HD media player). However, this was still jerky. So, next step, I put a free FTP server on the server and then tried to connect via FTP and copy over the file. The best I could get was 11meg a second. For the life of me, in my simple view of things, all seems good so, I thought i'd ask the experts for tips. Please take a quick look at the specs below and see if you can see why I'm only getting 11meg and im open to suggestions! Desktop(Ftp server)->x-over->Laptop(Ftp client) = 11meg a second Desktop(Ftp server)->homeplug(bedroom)->Laptop(Ftp client) = 4meg a second Ouch. So none of these are particuly good considering the direct connection with nothing in the middle. The PC's specs: Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @3.00 Ram 4gb Vista Home Premium 64 Boot disks SATA1: 2xWD Raptors (stripe) Storage SATA2: 2x Hitachi 1TB disks (stripe) Important bit?: Generic Marvell Yukon 88E8056 Ethernet Controller Settings below, any ideas?
The devices connect at 100meg but I can't see where to see if this is Full duplex or not. So, any ideas? I'm really struggling.... and very confused ![]() Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Networking Forums
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 41,832
OS: Windows 7, XP-Pro, Vista, Linux
Blog Entries: 1
|
Re: Poor network performance (x-over cable/FTP)
First off, homeplug is much slower than a CAT5 wire. Second, you're confusing bits and bytes. You have a 100mbit/sec connection, which translates to 12.5mbytes/sec. Getting 11 mbytes/sec on that connection is full speed, as there is some protocol overhead for the SMB protocol, as well as TCP/IP framing. If you really need faster transfers, you need to be looking at gigabit Ethernet connections.
You're struggling with a non-issue.
__________________
If TSF has helped you, Tell us about it! or Donate to help keep the site up! Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
OS: Vista Ultimate
|
Re: Poor network performance (x-over cable/FTP)
im pretty sure your wrong on this, you missunderstand me or you haven't explained it properly.
For a starters, Ethernet will only operate at 40% capacity and rapidly descends into chaos at that point! Soo ..... 100meg/8 = 12.5, this you are correct on BUT I have NEVER seen an ethernet network achieve above 50% in my life so, that means 50 meg (useable)/8 = 6.25. However, i don't think I am confusing Mbit and Mbytes and my maths above seem to suggest that as well as I physicaly could not run ethernet at 100%! Will confirm when I get home. Also, I'm using FTP not SMB for these speed tests (test with the simple, then introduce the complex) and the homeplugs are not being tested on the simple speed test - that was just so you can see where I want to go to. This is the current test setup, nothing complicated: Server <--- xover ethernet --->client |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Networking Forums
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 41,832
OS: Windows 7, XP-Pro, Vista, Linux
Blog Entries: 1
|
Re: Poor network performance (x-over cable/FTP)
Actually, I don't know where you get 40% for maximum capacity, but I can routinely get 9mbyte/sec transfers (SMB protocol) over a 100mbit link to some NAS boxes here, so you're mistaken. You're also living in the past with the Ethernet capacity numbers, because that was in the days of hubs and coax, where there were many collisions with high traffic. Even then, the figure we normally used was 70%. With full duplex switches in the mix, there are far fewer collisions, because all of the addressed traffic is routed to the specific destination and not to all stations. Broadcast packets are the only ones that are routed to all the stations.
If you've never seen over 50% utilization, I suggest you come to my office and look at my network. ![]() Finally, I'm not sure what your issue is, because if you believe your 40% number, you're getting more than you should, so the performance isn't really poor, right?
__________________
If TSF has helped you, Tell us about it! or Donate to help keep the site up! Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Last edited by johnwill; 09-24-2008 at 07:24 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|