![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| File and Application Sharing Help sharing network resources - We do not support P2P of any kind |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member, Networking Team
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,040
OS: Windows Server 2003
|
Wi-Fi "g" <?>
I have a DI-514 wireless router. It is now becoming outdated, not to say that it is not working, but some features seem like they would be corrected if I were to do a "tech refresh". I think it is Wireless A, if not B. I have 5 machines on my home network. They are all compatible with my router. I want to make my file sharing go a little quicker. So I am considering upgrading to Wireless G. Will my antennas that work wiht my "outdated router" be compatible with my new "wireless G" router? Will my network file sharing speeds be improved? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Networking Forums
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 31,468
OS: XP-Pro, Vista, Linux
Blog Entries: 1
|
Yes, the antennas are the same, since both standards use the same 2.4ghz channels. The file sharing speeds will be improved, but don't expect wired speeds. If you have a bunch of wireless machines all sharing one access point, things won't go that fast, since all of them contend for the same bandwidth, and the channel is half-duplex, just to slow things down a bit more.
![]() If you could wire some of the machines, you'd be amazed at the difference in file sharing speeds, even with 802.11g vs. wired.
__________________
If TSF has helped you, Tell us about it! or Donate to help keep the site up! Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member, Networking Team
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,040
OS: Windows Server 2003
|
Would my antennas with that work now with my old router work with my new one? If you had to recommend a router for fast speeds what would it be, why? The have in the ads today; G, Super G, and MIMO. I would imagine that that is fast, faster and fastest. Which one would you suggest? I would like to get the best range. I would also like to stay with D-Link, unless you can make the case for another hardware piece.
The wired option is really not on the table. My workstations are spread throughout the house. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Networking Forums
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 31,468
OS: XP-Pro, Vista, Linux
Blog Entries: 1
|
Many of the connections are standard, however you have to match the antenna connector to what is on a specific router product to know if it will work. If you currently have D-Link products, I would expect that newer D-Link products would still be compatible with the antenna connectors.
I always stick with the standard 802.11g stuff myself, since different manufacturer proprietary "turbo" schemes frequently cause problems with mis-matched brands of wireless clients. Many times, I end up having people disable the "turbo" modes in order to make all the pieces play together. One other thing of note. If you have one or more 802.11b devices active on the network, that will significantly impact all the network speeds.
__________________
If TSF has helped you, Tell us about it! or Donate to help keep the site up! Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Manager, Networking Forums
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 31,468
OS: XP-Pro, Vista, Linux
Blog Entries: 1
|
Quote:
__________________
If TSF has helped you, Tell us about it! or Donate to help keep the site up! Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Networking Forums
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 31,468
OS: XP-Pro, Vista, Linux
Blog Entries: 1
|
Obviously, having slower devices on a contention basis will slow everything down. :)
__________________
If TSF has helped you, Tell us about it! or Donate to help keep the site up! Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|