![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Cabling and Network Cards cable and nic support forum; D-Link, Netgear, Linksys, Cisco, Sun |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
OS: ALL
|
Network Utilization 100/F v 1000/F
I work on a very large production network. I am wondering the true differences between 100/F and 1000/F in terms of network utilization. Is there any reason, if you have the capability, to use 100/F besides software specifications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Networking Forums
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania, US
Posts: 28,754
OS: XP-Pro, Vista, Linux
Blog Entries: 1
|
Re: Network Utilization 100/F v 1000/F
If you have gigabit all around, there's no reason I can see not to use it. However, unless your network is properly designed, you could create a bottleneck somewhere if you have a couple of bandwidth hogs. One issue could be server access if a large number of workstations have gigabit access and are saturating their links.
__________________
If TSF has helped you, Tell us about it! or Donate to help keep the site up! Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|