![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
OS: Windows Vista SP1
|
Slow maximum frequency on processor, Vista x86
I'm a complete newbie at tech stuff so please be patient with me and tell me any additional information you need to help me.
I'm using Vista SP1 and I've recently noticed that the maximum frequency in the resource monitor flatlines at 54%. As I'm a bit of a gamer and have spent countless hours tweaking Vista in other respects, this is completely unacceptable to me. To make sure that it wasn't just resource monitor freaking out I installed several other applications including Everest and they tell me that my processor is clocked to about 998 MHZ for both cores. It should be 1828 MHZ, according to Everest. Any time I've tried using Notebook Hardware Control to switch my max processor state to more than 5% it simply says 'Error changing the processor state'. *I'm using Vista SP1 with a Mobile Dualcore Intel Core2 Duo T5550, 1.83 GHZ. *My chipset according to Everest is an Intel Crestline-GM GM965 *On booting, the BIOS menu gives me two options: A. Low Frequency, and B. dynamic processing. Choosing Low Frequency makes no difference. I have not found any other options in my BIOS relating to the processor. *Again, according to Everest, my CPU power is 997.6 MHZ at an FSB of 166.3 MHZ and a multiplier of 6. *When I go into vista power options, the option that says something like, 'when CPU starts to heat up, A. Turn down the CPU B. Turn up the fan' is no longer there. Also in vista power options, changing the max and min processor frequencies makes no difference, as my maximum frequency stays at 54%. *My fan is running fine, but my temperature stays around 56 degrees Celsius so it seems like it runs pretty quiet generally. *I have done a complete reinstall using Vista lite, disabling many different programs, disabled many services including system restore, and generally tweaking the computer to death. I've also repeatedly run CCleaner, Startup Inspector, and I've defragged the HDD, page file, and registry(I can not verify whether or not the reinstall was the exact point at which this problem occurred. I know that when I first got the computer it was loaded with all sorts of OEM crap, which prompted me to buy a new Vista CD, which I promptly used with Vista lite. I feel like I had this problem at least once before reinstalling though). Code:
Belarc Profile: Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1 (build 6001) Install Language: English (United States) System Locale: Japanese (Japan) TOSHIBA Satellite A305 PSAG0U-01900L -Processor 1.85 gigahertz Intel Core2 Duo 64 kilobyte primary memory cache 2048 kilobyte secondary memory cache 64-bit ready Multi-core (2 total) Not hyper-threaded -Main Circuit Board Board: Intel Corp. Base Board Product Name Base Board Version Serial Number: Base Board Serial Number Bus Clock: 667 megahertz BIOS: INSYDE 1.30 03/19/2008 -Drives 316.40 Gigabytes Usable Hard Drive Capacity 41.18 Gigabytes Hard Drive Free Space HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-T40F ATA Device [CD-ROM drive] OPMFQ MZ89AZ4X SCSI CdRom Device [CD-ROM drive] TOSHIBA MK3252GSX [Hard drive] (320.07 GB) -- drive 0, SMART Status: Healthy -Memory Modules 3062 Megabytes Usable Installed Memory Slot 'DIMM0' has 2048 MB (serial number 0x782B7B31) Slot 'DIMM2' has 1024 MB (serial number 0x00001117) Local Drive Volumes c: (NTFS on drive 0) 316.40 GB 41.18 GB free Network Drives None detected -Controllers ATA Channel 0 [Controller] (2x) ATA Channel 1 [Controller] (2x) Intel(R) ICH8M SATA AHCI Controller - 2829 Intel(R) ICH8M Ultra ATA Storage Controllers - 2850 Ricoh Memory Stick Host Controller Ricoh MMC Host Controller Ricoh xD-Picture Card Controller -Display Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family [Display adapter] (2x) Generic PnP Monitor (15.4"vis) -Bus Adapters ANZ62A62 IDE Controller Microsoft iSCSI Initiator Intel(R) ICH8 Family USB Universal Host Controller - 2830 Intel(R) ICH8 Family USB Universal Host Controller - 2831 Intel(R) ICH8 Family USB Universal Host Controller - 2832 Intel(R) ICH8 Family USB Universal Host Controller - 2834 Intel(R) ICH8 Family USB Universal Host Controller - 2835 Intel(R) ICH8 Family USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 2836 Intel(R) ICH8 Family USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 283A Last edited by mystere9; 10-28-2009 at 04:00 PM. |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,607
OS: Win7
|
Re: Slow maximum frequency on processor
EIST or Enhanced Intel Speedstep Technology will slow the cpu to conserve power and reduce heat, you have to either disable EIST in the Bios or use a program like NHC(Note Book Hardware Control) to view the CPU speed in the taskbar while using the computer.
http://www.pbus-167.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
OS: Windows Vista SP1
|
Re: Slow maximum frequency on processor
Quote:
It was: "Dynamic CPU Frequency Mode", and had only two options: "Always Low", and "Dynamic". Other people online appear to have had the additional option "Always High" which I did not have. I changed this several times and it made no difference. There were two other options that I regarded as irrelevant, but that were also related to the processor and were locked from editing. They were: "Intel Virtualization", which was locked on "Disabled", and "Intel Dynamic Acceleration" which was locked on "Enabled". I used NHC and am a little confused by what it was telling me. It said my processor was clocked to 1.83 GHZ, while both Everest and Real Temp are telling me that I'm at about 987, with 166 x 6. Windows is also telling me I'm clocked at 54%. Which is right? I thought maybe it was just adding the two cores together, but 987 x 2 does not equal 1828. edit: I looked it up online BTW, and my processor is supposed to be 166 x 11. Is the multiplier usually how Windows changes the processing dynamically? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,607
OS: Win7
|
Re: Slow maximum frequency on processor
Windows does not control the mulitplier the Bios does.
Try blowing the heatsink out with a can of compressed air backwards through the vents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
OS: Windows Vista SP1
|
Re: Slow maximum frequency on processor
I just found a BIOS update from Toshiba(After many hours of searching, since initally when I visited their site I was on Toshiba USA, which doesn't care about their customers). After installing, my BIOS once again successfully uses Dynamic processing! Toshiba EU, Banzai!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
OS: Windows Vista SP1
|
Re: Slow maximum frequency on processor
As a bit of an update: I figured out what the underlying problem was, and it's a bit of a no-brainer. The fan in my laptop can't get the heat out fast enough. My computer is clocked the same as when I bought it, but I tried prime95 on it. My computer heated up to 95 degrees Celsius and shut itself down in 19 seconds flat. I'm thinking about the compressed air thing you mentioned now, and trying to figure out the cheapest way I could feasibly do it since I don't have any compressed air laying around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tech Hardware Team
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,187
OS: vista
|
Re: Slow maximum frequency on processor
Hi canned air is not expensive as you only need to use it in short bursts,your local computer repair place should have it or check on line for prices
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|