![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 169
OS: XP / Ubuntu 6.10
|
Winsock and Vista
Hi all,
Helping with a Vista computer. Connected to router, valid IP, sending and receiving bytes. Cannot connect to web or ping urls (but can ping ip). Classic winsock DNS problem, right? Usually will run lspfix and/or winsockfix on XP and problem solved. But......what about Vista? I can't find a compatible tool for Vista. Can you reset the tcp/ip stack in Vista with the same commands as XP? (netsh....) Thanks for any advice. |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 169
OS: XP / Ubuntu 6.10
|
Re: Winsock and Vista
Now that I've had a chance to work on it, I think I have it under control.
Used spybot to check the LSP chain, and of course 1 and 2 are newdotnet. You know, I haven't worked with Vista much, but I think it's new "advanced security" is something of a joke. All the UAC seems to do is annoy the heck out of every single operation the user tries to perform. This person only had this PC for a week. Does Vista in any way protect a user from one of the oldest, most common forms of malware in existance? UAC needs to confirm my accessing Network in Control Panel, but it doesn't need to confirm changes in the registry to the LSP chain from crapware? Give me a break. As someone who once received a paycheck supporting M$ products, and who has vocally defended them for years, I can honestly say that I can't wait for the day when we are all running open source OS's and apps. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 169
OS: XP / Ubuntu 6.10
|
Re: Winsock and Vista
Thanks Dai, but I had tried that before posting
Actually I was looking more along these lines (which are basically the same commands as XP): Check and repair Winsock corruption. Click Start. In the Start Search dialog box, type: cmd, and right-click cmd. Click Run as administrator. Type: netsh winsock reset, and then press the ENTER key. Type: Exit and press ENTER. Restart the computer. Reset the TCP/IP protocol. Click Start. In the Start Search dialog box, type: cmd, and right-click cmd. Click Run as administrator. Type: netsh int ip reset, and then press ENTER. Type: Exit and press ENTER. Restart the computer. I had resolved the LSP problem without any of these steps, simply removing newdotnet did the trick. Last edited by hopper; 04-19-2007 at 08:44 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|