![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
OS: Vista SP1
|
RAM Availability(not the 3.2gb thing)
Windows Vista Home Premium SP1 build 6001
Upgraded ram from 1GB to 4GB. Vista reports 4GB installed in msinfo32 but only about 800mb are installed physical. same as watching perfmon, only uses about 800mb, just like it did before i upgraded the RAM, the ram was not purchased in addition to original, it was a full replacement, so the sticks are good, and also my second OS server 2k3(same HD) utilizes all the 3.5 i should have very well. Ran vista's memory diagnostic and no problems were found. Could someone clue me into what vista is up to with that? is there a setting or something i am missing. I was on phone with Micro for 2 hrs and he said it was going to the research team and they would contact me. Lame. any light that could be shed would be much appreciated. if this topic was posted already, sry for the double Thx |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 142
OS: Windows Vista
|
Re: RAM Availability(not the 3.2gb thing)
Unless I am reading you wrong, all of your memory is installed physically but you are only using 800 MB of th total available memory. The rest of it is cached ready to be used if need be. Whatever you were using previous to the memory upgrade will not change as a result of the memory upgrade.
The amount of phsical memory used is equal to what is running in the system at the present time. So if you open an application that is not currently running you will see an increase in the amount of physical memory being used. Vista remembers what applications you use most frequently ard caches those applications into memory at startup to reduce the time necessary to load the application when you need it. This is why Vista usually takes so long to boot up. If you want to know your total phsical memory installed and what has been cached, and therefore by deduction what is being used look in task manager: Capture.JPG |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
OS: Vista SP1
|
Re: RAM Availability(not the 3.2gb thing)
image 1.Firefox is only thing running..
![]() 2. Here there is two Game clilents open and connected, also VMware is running and streaming a video on firefox, Winamp is also running. notice there is no increase in total RAM ![]() Since i posted, Microsoft "Research Team" called me and did exactly what the first guy did, i allowed remote, he looked at TM, MSinfo32, and again told me theyd have to look into it. so i have no clue. Vista isnt only not showing that its there, its not utilizing it when it should be. In the second pic, the computer is very slow to respond. Even with 4 of those clients running in the other OS it has no issues when utilizing all 4GB. Vista will lock up and throws the clients off the internet, and inevitably something will go unresponsive. The second pic was going to be with 3 clients, but they kept crashing, and once the screen capture software i had went unresponsive. The HD is very clean, having uninstalled, Defraged, Registry cleaned, disk cleanup. i have only stuff running that i use regularly. so no, thats what the first guy from microsoft tried to tell me as well, but when he looked at himself, he passed it on to someone else. I have no idea. i do know what im doing to some degree, i have a couple IT certs. but i dont understand why vista wont use all the memory... any help is appreciated thx Edit:posted wrong pic Last edited by Nghf7659 : 05-12-2008 at 08:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
OS: Vista SP1
|
Re: RAM Availability(not the 3.2gb thing)
this is the mobo, from a prefab by acer obviously.
Acer EM61SM/EM61PM OCZ pc6400 DDR2 800mhz, which is the same speed that came out of it. Also this is a pic from the other os on the HD. notice all 4gigs show, and its utilizing past 766mb. there is 3 game clients open, and a bunch more stuff, way more than in vista. Winamp, audacity, firefox is streaming a video. xfire, yahoo messenger, WMP, all running when that shot was taken. ![]() Its not the old memory that vista uses either, its 1gb of the 4 brand new installed, the other sticks are removed. Edit:forgot to upload pic Cant see it but its using almost 900mb there. Last edited by Nghf7659 : 05-12-2008 at 08:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
OS: Vista SP1
|
Re: RAM Availability(not the 3.2gb thing)
maybe i misunderstand, but i can only boot one at a time, from startup. Vista was the first one i booted after installing the new memory, i bought it to improve Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8
OS: Vista SP1
|
Re: RAM Availability(not the 3.2gb thing)
Vista is not performing any better than it did before the upgrade, while the other operating system is using it and has been running great ever since. IN server 2k3 i can get it to utilize 1gb or more of memory. when i try the same in vista, it gets up there to high 6-700mb and its starts getting very slow and unresponsive. no where in the above did i say it was running better in vista.... the other os is not the issue, i merely used it as an example to show that the ram is functioning as intended, BUT NOT WITH VISTA.
summary: Vista is running like it did before the 4gb upgrade. Will not utilize over what it was previously using. Now if anyone can shed any light on this, i would be grateful. I dont know how to further clarify this... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|