![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Windows NT/2000/2003 Server/2008 Server Find support for Windows NT/2000/2003 Server/2008 Server editions. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 510
OS: XP2,WIN03,UBUNTU,CentOS,Bayanihan,FEDORA 8
|
Data Synchronization on Win03 Servers
- hey guys does windows 2003 server has the capability to synchronize data with another win03 server. we have file 2 servers which we would like to synchronize their data for fault tolerance.
|
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Omaha, The Center of the Universe
Posts: 7,632
OS: WinXP, Win2K3
|
Normally you would setup drives in a RAID array for fault tolerance. Not across servers. Using a scenario as what you have described will use up resources, waste hard drive space and increase network traffic.
Your best solution would be to setup a RAID 5 array on a single server and implement a backup strategy. Last edited by crazijoe; 03-01-2007 at 06:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 510
OS: XP2,WIN03,UBUNTU,CentOS,Bayanihan,FEDORA 8
|
- thanks
- but the main reason why i want to synchronize data between 2 servers is that in our network we only have 1 file server the main server. i want to synchronize the data between our main server and the secondary server so that in case the entire main server is down our users can still access their files in the secondary server. - can this be possible? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Omaha, The Center of the Universe
Posts: 7,632
OS: WinXP, Win2K3
|
I don't think it is possible on server but I may be wrong. You may have to look at third party apps for that. But I still think that with all that replication traffic, it will just saturate your network and network performance will be hindered.
I think your better off with setting up a RAID 5 array. If a drive goes bad, it wil not bring down the array. Slap a new drive in it's place and it will start rebuilding itself on the fly without out interruptions. Users can still access files if a drive fails. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 510
OS: XP2,WIN03,UBUNTU,CentOS,Bayanihan,FEDORA 8
|
- i have read an article about publishing shared files on the active directory and using DFS since active directory replicates its self to different domains if 1 domain is down the other domain can process the users request like nothing happens, users can still access their file. is this true?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Omaha, The Center of the Universe
Posts: 7,632
OS: WinXP, Win2K3
|
We do not use DFS or FRS on our domain so I don't have much of any experience with it just from what I have read and tested with.
DFS might be something you want to investigate in. You can read more about it here. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...s/default.mspx |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|