![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Windows NT/2000/2003 Server/2008 Server Find support for Windows NT/2000/2003 Server/2008 Server editions. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Western PA
Posts: 383
OS: Vista x64
|
Dual, backup DHCP servers, one went down, workstations still got 169.x addys..?
Here is my domain config: Two DCs, a few member servers.. a GC is set on both DCs. Both of these DCs act as DNS/DHCP servers, providing fault tolerance if one server is down/off.
Earlier today we had one of them offline. A brand new workstation was brought out of its box today, connected to the wall. It failed to find an IP address.. went into 169.x low connectivity mode. Similarly, existing workstations (i'm assuming ones who had ip addresses from the secondary, down, DHCP server) that were working fine, if repaired the connection or logged off and back on.. could not then attain an ip address. Shouldnt this fault tolerant situation still allow for the workstations to retrieve an IP address from the other DHPC, if the other one goes down? I really was at a loss as to why the redundancy wasnt working (no error logs either)... Thanks for any help. |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Western PA
Posts: 383
OS: Vista x64
|
Quote:
Yep they are both authorized and have worked as such in the past too.. I'm not quite doing the full 80/20 rule.. more like 50/50, but this shouldnt matter i dont think... There is also no other rougue DHCPs on the network either. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|