![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Windows 2000 Pro / NT Workstation Support Find support for Windows 2000 Pro / NT Workstation here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Defrag surprise
Hi - my file system is NTFS, my pagefile is 384MB, chkdsk reports 140MB used by system and log file 65MB. But defrag analysis shows a contiguous block at the start of my drive that is 'system files' and appears to be about 5 GIGA (!) bytes.... This seems wrong/unlikely. Any ideas?
__________________
Dane Brooke Seattle! |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,321
OS: XP SP3/Vista/7 Server 2K/2K3/2K8
|
Re: Defrag surprise
Not with Windows 2000 it's not, that feature was introduced with Windows ME and was "refined" with windows XP.
Perhaps the contiguous block is system files that have not changed or moved, so they would give that appearance?
__________________
Computers make it easier to do a lot of things, but most of the things they make it easier to do don't need to be done. The inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Hardware Forums
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: west australia
Posts: 56,702
OS: win 7 32x 64x rtm
|
Re: Defrag surprise
2000 came after me and is the business version of xp so system restore has to be done manually as most businesses do
was 2000 installed on a recovery partition inicially
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,321
OS: XP SP3/Vista/7 Server 2K/2K3/2K8
|
Re: Defrag surprise
Actually 2000 came before XP by a good two years. NT/2000/XP all share the same basic core architecture, whereas Windows 9x (95/98/ME) still had a DOS base that it worked on. XP was the merging of the two operating system paths that provided a single architecture for both business and home users.
__________________
Computers make it easier to do a lot of things, but most of the things they make it easier to do don't need to be done. The inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
|
Re: Defrag surprise
Tis also the Windows 2000 support section...
If you measure the contents of /WINNT and then /WINNT/SYSTEM32, what are their sizes? There are utilities like "Disktective" http://www.disktective.com/ that will show you what weighs what in regards to your hard drive's contents. Pie charts, mmmmm... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|