![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| RAM and Power Supply Support Support forum for memory and power supplies; Kingston, Corsair, PNY |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 54
OS: Windows Vista 64 Bit
|
RAM Amount
"Food for thought; The 32bit version of Win XP is for the most part maxed out using 2gigs of memory, even gaming. Don't buy more than you need!
Windows Vista however runs better at the starting points of 2 gigs and runs even better with more! There is no configuration to get 3 gigs to run in dual mode configuration, 2 gigs of ram in dual channel mode will run just as fast as 3 gigs in single channel mode, so; more is better is not always true." Just so I am clear on this, I am running XP Pro and I have 6GB of RAM, And when I open System under the control panel where is what it tells me in the General Tab under Computer: Intel Core i7 CPU 975@ 3.33Hz 1.59 GHz, 2.49 GB of RAM Is this reading correct, even thought I have 6 GB of RAM. Is it telling me only the amount that XP is capable of running or do I have a problem? I eventually will upgrade to Windows 7 after some of the bugs are fixed, the reason for all the extras. Motherboard:EVGA X58 CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT 6GB (3 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1866 (PC3 15000) Thank you. |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tech Hardware Team
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,038
OS: Vista Home Premium SP1,Win XP SP3,Ubuntu 9.04,Sabayon 4,Windows 7 RC1 x64
|
Re: RAM Amount
Basically you will need a 64-bit version to fully utilize the memory.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=3124 http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000811.html
__________________
![]() "The dumbest people I know are those who know it all." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Hardware Tech Team
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 3,828
OS: Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 + Ubuntu 9.04
|
Re: RAM Amount
A 32-bit OS will only see up to 3.5GB of RAM, usually with XP it sees 3.25GB. 2.5GB is lower than what is usually seen, but it's true either way that you will need a 64-bit OS to see more than 3.5GB.
__________________
![]() Good PSU brands: Corsair, SeaSonic, CWT, PC Power and Cooling, Thermaltake Toughpower, CoolerMaster Real Power Pro On 80+ Certification - PSU Information and Selection - Power Supply Myths You don't get what you don't pay for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 54
OS: Windows Vista 64 Bit
|
Re: RAM Amount
Thank you.
So should I be concerned the XP only shows 2.94GB? Is it the way the RAm is installed on the mother board. My board has 6 RAM slots and I have 3 sticks of RAM each 2GB apiece. I have installed them the way EVGA suggested, in slots 1,3,5. I do have some older RAM 4-Cosair CM2X1024-8500C5D 1GB apiece. Should I use this instead? Now wasn't there a way in the bios to make XP recognize more physical RAM up to the the max that the OS could use? Or was that just an option in older motherboards. I realize that I need either XP64, to get use of all the RAM. How about Vista 32, it the same thing as XP 32. Last any one been using the new windows 7? Any better then any version of Vista, better than XP? Thanks again Last edited by DEHawk; 08-25-2009 at 06:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Hardware Tech Team
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 3,828
OS: Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 + Ubuntu 9.04
|
Re: RAM Amount
There's no reason not to go 64-bit. It runs just as fast (if not faster) than 32-bit operating systems. XP 64 is no longer supported by Microsoft and never had very good drivers anyway, so I advise against that. Vista x64 is tolerable, and Windows 7 x64 is decent. Plus you can see up to 128GB of RAM.
__________________
![]() Good PSU brands: Corsair, SeaSonic, CWT, PC Power and Cooling, Thermaltake Toughpower, CoolerMaster Real Power Pro On 80+ Certification - PSU Information and Selection - Power Supply Myths You don't get what you don't pay for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Re: RAM Amount
I am still getting updates with the Windows XP Pro x64, so that is still supported by MS. And it is much faster than 32 bit. Windows 7 x64 is by far a lot better than Vista. I will migrate to that when my Windows xp pro x64 is no longer upgradable. Granted, if you would think about the xp x64, do your research, especially on the drivers. It is a very good OS. It is not the OS's fault that some programs and hardware does not work. It is the companies that is slow on the up keep of programs and drivers. And don't take advice from people that says Windows xp pro x64 is no good, in less they had run the program. I run duel boot, xp x64 for my main OS, and Windows 7 x64 RC1 for my secondary. Till March 2010, when I have to take it out. I will probably buy it in the fall of 2010.
You should be getting at least 3.25gb of ram with 32bit OS, if not. Then you might have a bad ram in one or 2 of the slots. Last edited by AlienMenace; 08-25-2009 at 09:48 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|