![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Other Hardware Support Support forum for other hardware; Mice, keyboards, PDAs |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 30
OS: win98
|
Memory Problems
Good Evening- Could somebody PLS help me!!!! My mobo is SOYO K7VTAPRO , cpu athlonXP 1800+. For 3 years I had memory installed 2 sticks 256 + 128 =total 384 KINGSTON KVR-PC 133/128 and KVR-PC133/256 R.I also want to mention that the old memory is one sided. I decided to buy more memory. On ebay I bought 2 sticks of BRAND NEW KINGSTON 512 MB each . The print on new memory says- KVR 133X64 C3/512 - 512 MB PC133 DIMM CL3 .The new memory is doubled sided - if it is of any importance. I took old memory out of slots and installed one stick of 512MB - everything worked great. Next step I added second stick of 512 MB and - while booting I got memory error. I tried to istall any memory in any combination starting with 512mb in slot number one = nothing worked. What should I do next - dont You think that I should update my BIOS????? or should I try something different - THANK YOU so much for Your help = Andrew
|
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 30
OS: win98
|
I Did Another Try
I installed first stick of memory (512 mb) in slot 1 and second stick of the same memory 512 mb in slot 3. I got the error saying - WINDOWS ENCOUNTERED AN ERROR ACCESSING THE SYSTEM REGISTRY, WINDOWS WILL RESTART AND REPAIR THE SYSTEM REGISTRY FOR YOU. I did click OK - and got the same message again and again. I checked manufacturer's site for BIOS UPGRADE - it looks like I have the latest BIOS. Do YOu Guys think that if I upgrade operating system from current windows 98 second edition to windows 2000 - IT MIGHT HELP????Thank You = Andrew
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Omaha, The Center of the Universe
Posts: 7,632
OS: WinXP, Win2K3
|
Quote:
Have you tried each 512MB stick individually? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Troubled
|
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304943
CAUSE Windows Me and Windows 98 are not designed to handle more than 1 GB of RAM. More than 1 GB can lead to potential system instability. Back to the top WORKAROUND To work around this issue, add the following line to the [386enh] section of the System.ini file: MaxPhysPage=40000 This limits the amount of physical RAM that Windows can access to 1 GB. To add this line, use the following steps: 1. Use any text editor (such as Notepad) to open the System.ini file in the Windows folder. 2. Add the following line in the [386Enh] section of the file: MaxPhysPage=40000 3. Save the file, and then restart your computer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Omaha, The Center of the Universe
Posts: 7,632
OS: WinXP, Win2K3
|
Win9X can see more memory but it can only address 512MB of it. This has to do with a design fault way back in the 8088 CPU days. Intel made some very bad design decisions with this CPU. First, it used a segmented architecture. Secondly, for some incomprehensible reason, Intel chose to organise its memory access in such a way that IBM felt constrained to limit the theoretical maximum RAM of the original PC to 640k. Even in those early days, these were short-sighted decisions, and we have all suffered from them ever since. If you've ever had an 'out of memory' error message, then you have met this design fault yourself. DOS, Windows 3.1, and Win9X/ME all have base-memory problems which are directly caused by the 640k barrier. Only true 32-bit operating systems like Linux, OS/2 and Win2K/XP/2K3 escape this problem. This is another reason why Mac systems are so much faster with a slower processor.
Theoretically yes, Win9x can access more than 512MB of memory, but to do so it has to switch into 'protected mode', and it can't get back into the normal 'real mode' without a complete reset. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|