![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Motherboards, Bios & CPU Support Forum for Motherboards and CPUs; ASUS, Intel, AMD, BioStar |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
OS: XP
|
Asus P4C800 Deluxe's Promise controller and more related.
Useful Links related to my questions:
Overview P4C800 Deluxe Specs P4C800 Deluxe Drivers for P4C800 Deluxe Related non-OEM products from Promise's website: Serial / ATA Card - FastTrak S150 TX2plus Serial /ATA Card (non-RAID) - SATA150 TX2plus 1.) From the Specs and Overview and reading the Manual we get the following info: ""The P4C800 Deluxe offers the most complete RAID solution. A Promise SATA controller offers RAID 0, 1 and 10 functions with Max. 2 UltraATA 133 ports and 2 SATA HD ports, enabling users to build a RAID array with any 2, 3 or 4 of the ports. With unique multi-RAID function, RAID 0 and RAID 1 array can co-exist." ""Promise 20378 RAID controller: 1 x UltraDMA 133 support two hard drives 2 x Serial ATA RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 0+1, Multiple RAID" My question: Does it mean that we can use the following cominations?: 1.1 - two SATA HDDs connected to the SATA ports, in RAID 0 1.2 - two ATA HDDs connected to the ATA ports, in RAID 0 1.3 - one SATA HDD connected to a SATA port and one ATA HDD connected to the ATA port, in RAID 0 1.4 - one SATA RAID array and one ATA RAID array in the same time 1.5 - two (one SATA + one ATA) RAID arrays 1.6 - one SATA RAID 0 array mirrored on a HDD of equal or larger size connected to an ATA port (RAID 0+1) 1.7 - one SATA RAID 0 array mirrored on a RAID 0 array connected to ATA (RAID 0+1) 1.8 - SATA or ATA HDDs, maximum four, used independently on any port 1.9 - one RAID (0 or 1) array and one or two independent HDDs (lets say for storage etc) 1.10 - four HDDs in RAID 0 2.) Second question is related to the DRIVERS I have to use for my Promise FastTrack 378 (chipset PDC20378) integrated (OEM) controller. On ASUS's website I found three types of drivers for download: A - 378raid_100137.zip that is explained as : "Promise FastTrak 378 RAID Driver V1.00.1.37 for Windows 98SE/NT4/ME/2000/XP/2003" or "FastTrak 376/378 Driver" in the README file. B - 378ata_100104528.zip that is explained as : "Promise SATA378 Driver V1.00.0.26 (ATA Mode) " or "Promise SATA378 Driver" in the README file. C - 378ATA100130.zip that is explained as : "Promise FastTrak 378 ATA Driver V1.00.1.30 " or "Promise SATA378 Driver" in the README file. On the original ASUS CD that came with my motherboard I found the following drivers: A (CD) - 378ATA explained as "Promise SATA378 Driver" in the README file B (CD) - 378RAID explained as "FastTrak 376/378 Driver" in the README file There are also two .doc files "FastTrak 378 Quick Start Guide v1.0_OEM" and "SATA 378 Quick Start Guide v1.0_OEM" There is NO clear explanation in the Manual, README files or other docs on why are two or three types of drivers for the same chipset. It seems that this Promise FastTrak 378 controller OEM card can be used as a RAID controller (see SATA150 TX2plus) or as SATA/ATA simple ports (see S150 TX2plus) extention card, but not both in the same time (is my question 1.9 valid then?!?). Why Promise creates two non-OEM (FastTrak S150 TX2plus and SATA150 TX2plus) cards and one "two in one" sollution for OEM then? Why there are two SATA drivers ('B' and 'C') on Asus web site, one branded as "ATA mode"?!? Related to these questions above I found some answres in Google\Group, but none very clear. 3.) Third question: Is the Promise OEM BIOS integrated with the motherboard BIOS? I think I've seen in one of BIOS update ROM file related README file that the "Promise FastTrak BIOS will be updated together with this file". What does it mean? 4.) Fourth question. For the moment I'm using two 80Gb Seagate SATA HDDs in RAID 0 with Windows XP Pro SP1 installed. Under Device Manager \ SCSI and RAID Controllers tab I can see the following: A. - SCSI\RAID Host Controller B. - Win XP Promise FastTrack 376/378 (tm) Controller C. - XMASSCSI SCSI Controller I can understand what 'B' is, but not 'A' and 'C'. 5.) Fifth question: The SATA connectors controlled by the ICH5 chipset. Where are the drivers for them? I read somewhere that SP1 introduced them. What about Win XP before SP1. There is no download link on Asus website. Or maybe is the Intel(R) Chipset Software Installation Utility that provides some SATA support? Correct me if I'm wrong. Under Device Manager \ IDE ATA/ATAPI ontrollers I have the following: A. - Intel(R) 82801EB Ultra ATA Storage Controllers B. - Primary IDE channel C. - Secondary IDE channel Is 'A' the SATA driver for the two SATA (ICH5) ports on my motherboard? 6.) What is the difference between Compatible Mode and Enhanced Mode in Asus's P4C800 Deluxe's BIOS. I've got some clues that in Compatible mode Win 9x and Me would access peripherals through BIOS's I/O ports meanwhile Win 2000/XP would access them throgh PCI addresses. How does it exactly work? Any gurus around? Also, while doing some testing and installing a Win 98 SE in Compatible Mode I realised that it recognized the RAID 0 array on my Promise controller from the first (no RAID drivers needed at installation), but then there is yet a RAID driver to be installed on Asus web site. Meanwhile Win XP in Enhanced Mode won't be able to recognize my RAID array whithout a driver. Total confusion. Many thanks in advance, Julian |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guru
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 2,655
OS: XP Pro
|
Hi Iulian, and welcome to the forum. I am catching up on still-unreplied threads which occurred since my vacation. You ask many questions. Let me see what I can do with this, it will take some time. I will give a new description of the mobo capabilities, then take each question one at a time, that way I can inject more extra details that might not come up otherwise. Here goes...
For P4C800 Deluxe: PRI_IDE: driven by ICH5, can support 1 or 2 PATA drives in non-RAID mode SEC_IDE: driven by ICH5, can support 1 or 2 PATA drives in non-RAID mode SATA1 & 2: driven by ICH5, can support 1 or 2 SATA drives in non-RAID mode SATA_RAID1 & 2, PRI_RAID: driven by Promise PDC20378, together in either non-RAID or RAID mode: in non-RAID mode, -can support 1 to 4 SATA and/or PATA drives -does not support ATAPI devices, whether PATA or SATA. in RAID mode, -can support (AFAIK) 1 or 2 pairs, of 2 drives each, in RAID0 or RAID1 mode, creating up to 2 arrays. The arrays need not be the same mode: having one RAID0 and one RAID1 array would be termed "Multi-RAID". -can support 4 drives (2 SATA plus 2 PATA) in a single RAID0+1 array. -does not support "Span" or "JBOD" modes. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But I would caution you that RAID0 on IDE is quite inefficent unless you have multiple RAID IDE ports, such as on the P4P800 Deluxe's VIA6410 controller. Sharing an IDE cable in a RAID0 array can cut your throughput due to sharing of the cable, depending on the application. The sharing effect doesn't seem to impact RAID0+1 as badly. Quote:
But it would not be a good idea to mix technologies (SATA + IDE) in a RAID0 array. Drives should be as identical as possible. This doesn't seem to matter as much for RAID1, but you can get some performance improvements if the RAID1 drives are closer to being identical, since with 2 spindles, either drive can respond and the heads need not be at the same spot. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The RAID0+1 configurations use 4 HDD's. Typically the auto-setup mode first creates a RAID0 array of the two SATA drives on SATA_RAID1 & 2, then mirrors each of those to one of the two drives on PRI_RAID. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yes you are right the promise runs in either RAID or IDE mode, but not both at the same time. The setting is controlled in BIOS by Advanced- Onboard Devices Configuration- Onboard Promise Controller "Operating Mode". Quote:
If you search the Promise site you will find almost NO mention of the PDC20378 chip, its drivers, or its BIOS, nor the PDC20376 or PDC20375 chips either. They keep the OEM stuff completely hidden, probably so that the OEM's will have to do all the support. And that makes sense to me. Never try to use any drivers downloaded from the Promise website, to run your onboard chip. it will be just asking for trouble. Quote:
Quote:
BTW the BIOS for each chunk cannot be independently updated. New versions have to be brought into the main BIOS by the mobo manufacturer, who then releases a new BIOS that integrates it into the binary. The user updates to the new BIOS (e.g. v1015) and gets the other chunks too. Sometimes dependent software then has to be updated on the OS too, by the user. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But the Promise company has been around for a long time, and has for years had some pretty impressive migration caoabilities built-in. You maye have accidentally gotten the advantage of one of those. Hope this helps, -clintfan Last edited by clintfan; 08-21-2004 at 12:29 PM. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1
OS: XP
|
Wow, this was exactly what I was looking for and it answered all of the questions I've had since I installed my P4C800-E Deluxe board! The manual was NOT clear and ASUS support was unattainable!
Thank you Mr. Clintfan, whoever you are! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
OS: XP SP2
|
A speed benefit from using a Non-RAID SATA controller card?
I will soon be loading M-Powered ProTools on my Dell Pentium IV 3.4GHz desktop (2.256GB RAM). ProTools will become unstable if the audio files it works on are stored with it on the system drive, so I will add a dedicated audio file storage drive. Furthermore, ProTools does not tolerate any kind of RAID configuration, so neither a speed boost nor a mirrored drive file safety backup benefit from a RAID 1 or RAID 0 pair of drives is possible.
Both the system drive (storing Windows XP SP2 and ProTools) and the WAV file storage drive are 7200RPM SATA. And the desktop’s Intel 875p motherboard has two SATA ports. However, I am curious about one thing: Is a speed boost possible if one or both drives were instead run by a separate non-RAID controller card? If this happens to be true, please explain why. And if it will, in fact, make the pc run noticeably faster, please suggest one or more specific make and model cards. Thank you. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|