![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Laptop Support Support Forum for laptops; Sony, Toshiba, HP, Acer, Dell |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
OS: winxp
|
Config Help
Well i'm new to the forum so excuse me if i'm posting in the wrong place.
Well i need some advice. I'm buying a new laptop. Its motherboard supports a maximum of 4GB of memory. Is it advisible for me to max my memory to 4 GB or leave it at 3 GB cause in a number of magazines i've read that, if you max your memory to the motherboard potential it doesn't utilise it completely. Also it has a 320 GB HDD in it. I would like to know how many partitions should be made and what the partition size should be,to gain maximum performance. |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tech, Microsoft Support
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,193
OS: Windows XP SP3
|
Re: Config Help
If you are going to install a 32-bit OS in the computer, it will only utilize about 3 GB of the memory, so I would say don't get the 4 GB unless the price difference is trivial. There are some speed gains from matched RAM modules, so 4 GB is useful that way, but again, I don't know whether you would get enough speed difference to justify more than a trivial price increase.
Don't partition your hard drive. Partitioning does not in any way increase performance.
__________________
Balaji Ramanathan Computers - You can't live with them, you can't live without them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Moderator Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 12,328
OS: XP, Vista, Win 7
|
Re: Config Help
While partitioning a drive does not improve performance, it will allos you to separate your data from the operating system so that incase you have to reinstall, then data is untouched.
There are other advantages as well: http://partition.radified.com/partitioning_2.htm
__________________
Rich Last edited by simpswr; 02-12-2009 at 04:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tech, Microsoft Support
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,193
OS: Windows XP SP3
|
Re: Config Help
True about data being untouched by a reinstall of the OS, but then, the data should be backed up and available on an external disk anyways. If not, it is just a disaster waiting to happen as hard disks fail all the time.
__________________
Balaji Ramanathan Computers - You can't live with them, you can't live without them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tech, Microsoft Support
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,193
OS: Windows XP SP3
|
Re: Config Help
Ah well, what I meant to say was that having the data untouched is not really an advantage as far as I am concerned because my backup data is anyway untouched by an OS reinstall. All I have to do after an OS install is copy it back where it belongs.
![]() I guess I am just biased against partitioning of hard drives. I have never been convinced that it bought me anything.
__________________
Balaji Ramanathan Computers - You can't live with them, you can't live without them!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|