![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Building Get helpful information regarding building a computer. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
OS: XP Pro
|
Ye Opinions Welcome...
Just a little build I'm doing, mainly for a racing sim setup I'm going to be building. Nothing too crazy, although I do want some room to upgrade if I ever get back into PC games like I used to be. My main concern was RAM compatibility with the MB.
Also, I would like HDMI out from the video card as I will be using this with my flatscreen. MB: GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3P CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz Video Card: ASUS EN9800GT RAM: OCZ Reaper HPC 4GB DDR2 1066 PS: Thermaltake Purepower 550W HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200 Optical Drive: Samsung OS: Vista Home Premium 64-Bit Case: LIAN LI PC-7B plus II So thar it be. Nothing to crazy, and I believe I've got some room to upgrade in the future. Should run the sims with no problem I believe. Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Asst Manager Hardware
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 19,672
OS: XP Professional
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Thermaltake Purepower = Cheap junk. Try a 750 Corsair in there.
__________________
![]() ---------- I don't receive email notifications of replies to subscribed threads. (Internet provider policy) Therefore, if I don't respond to your post within 24 hours, please send me a reminder PM and include the link to your thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Hardware Specialist
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Are you a pirate...?
Hehe kidding. The only problem i see is the power supply, it isn't powerful enough for that graphics card. I'd go with a quality 650W or 700W power supply. Edit: The 750W corsair is only $10 more and and a WHOLE lot better value Last edited by Jtsou; 12-25-2008 at 11:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Asst Manager Hardware
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 19,672
OS: XP Professional
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
__________________
![]() ---------- I don't receive email notifications of replies to subscribed threads. (Internet provider policy) Therefore, if I don't respond to your post within 24 hours, please send me a reminder PM and include the link to your thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
OS: XP Pro
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Ok, RAM is really confusing the hell out of me, I've looked around and read a bunch of stuff, but it's still...really confusing.
![]() The RAM I was thinking of getting, DDR2 1066, has a CAS of 5, and timings of 5.5.5.18. Now, looking at DDR2 800, CAS of 4, and timings of 4.4.4.15. The memory standard of the motherboard I'm looking at is DDR2 1333, which doesn't seem to exist as far as I can tell. Now, to me, the 1066 is faster even though the timings aren't as tight, 8500 vs 6400. Right? And each one is running at 400 and 533, but can be overclocked to achieve it's advertised clock speed, which is 800 or 1066 respectively. And what about the MB memory standard? ![]() Thanks in advance for your input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,673
OS: Win7
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Lets start at the speed ratings DDR2(Double Data Rate Version 2) so double the speed it runs at to get the rated speed for example memory buss runs at 400 so with ddr that's DDR2 800 no OC necessary.
With Intel the FSB and Memory buss are 2 different buses, if the memory buss runs at 400 with DDR2 and in dual channel for 2 pipe lines at 800 the FSB from the memory controller on the board to the CPU at a single pipe line at 1333 you will not over run the memory until you OC the cpu speed up to near 4.0 so what this over simplified explanation means is you will not see a big advantage to DDR2 1066 over DDR2 800 so pick which ever is cheaper using a memory configuration utility like the one at www.corsair.com/configurator/default.aspx or www.crucial.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
OS: XP Pro
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Quote:
The FSB and memory bus are two separate buses, on that Gigabyte MB they are 1600mhz and 1333mhz respectively. I would have to sticks of 2gb each running in dual channel @ 1066mhz, and with the memory bus of 1333mhz which is a single channel, it would not be overloaded. I could overclock the RAM to a maximum of 1333mhz? Guess I'm still a little confused. I see you mentioned OC'ing the CPU and that would overload the memory, how does that effect the RAM? What would be the advantage of the 1066 over the 800? I went ahead and ordered the 1066 since it was the same price with the rebates and sale, just trying to understand the logic and science/voodoo behind it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,673
OS: Win7
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
IF it's the same price your good, you will not see any advantage to 1066 over 800 unless the CPU runs fast enough to process the Data faster then the memory buss can deliver it.
The sticks don't run at 1600 they run at 400 but have a larger pipe to put more data in between the ram sticks and the memory controller(Northbridge chip), the pipe between the memory controller and the cpu is smaller but has a faster speed(more pressure in pipe terms). No you can't OC the ram to 1333Mhz |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
OS: XP Pro
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Quote:
And you're saying that the pipe between the RAM and the Northbridge is running at 1600mhz, and the pipe between the Northbridge and the CPU is running at 1333mhz, or do I have it backwards? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,673
OS: Win7
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
If your CPU has a FSB of 1066 like the older Q6600 you will see no gain from 800 to 1066 speed memory there is not a direct connection between the 2 like their is on an AMD chip
I'm not saying the ram or anything else runs 1600 I'm saying the ram runs 400 and has the ability to send more data through the circuit the the cpu can handle at 1066 or 1333 the speed correlation and the amount of data the two buses can handle are two different things and work differently otherwise you would want to match the fsb/cpu speed and the memory speed, in the case of Intel you need to. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
OS: XP Pro
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Quote:
And I did match the speed of the memory with the speed of the CPU FSB which is 1066, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,673
OS: Win7
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
It does not matter with Intel, the cpu will never run faster then 800 if you got 1066 for the same price fine it will work just fine but so would 800 and if it was cheaper then that would be the one to buy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,673
OS: Win7
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
Yea it should read "in the case of Intel you don't need to." Unfortunately I think faster then I can Type.
Last edited by wrench97; 12-29-2008 at 01:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Moderator, Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Pennsylvania
Posts: 18,673
OS: Win7
|
Re: Ye Opinions Welcome...
It's limited it just that the FSB can only pass data to the cpu so fast and the cpu can only process it so fast, the ram at 800 and the size of the bandwidth can pass data faster then the CPU can process it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|