![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Design Discussion & FAQs Answers to frequently asked questions, and a place to share your knowledge, ideas, and inquiries |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Real-time Motion Video
Hi There,
Newbie on the block by the way so be gentle! I'm after tapping into the knowledge out there regarding realistic real-time video / audio compression and delivery over RF. I know that's a lot but let's start off small. I have a pinhole camera + mic the output of which needs to be viewed/heard about 1Km away. The image will be motion video as the camera will be mounted on a robot that is moving about inside a room. From what I have read, decent quality motion video starts at around 24frame-per-second (fps) with 15fps being used for low-end stuff like webcam / videoconferencing. So assuming I go for 24fps and want a 640x480 image then I am looking at 640*480*24 = ~7.3Mbps (*bits*-per-second). Sound OK so far? Now I wreckon this is going to be way too much for my RF link (details later) and so I have a number of options I guess : 1) compress 2) reduce image size and 3) reduce frame rate. Now the frame rate should stay at 24fps as the motion content is important the end-user so we have only image size and compression remaining. An image of 320x240 (which might be acceptable to the end-user) will give ~1.8Mbps - getting better. What I have no idea on is what I can expect from a MPEG4-10 / H.264 compression engine for this type of image size / content (motion video). Any thoughts anyone? Regarding the RF link - well this aint designed yet. I am at the stage of trading-off on frequency vs. range vs. data rate vs. modulation vs channel bandwith. All good fun. I am looking to get operating in the 900MHz ISM band but the data rate / modulation concrens me down here. Does anyone have any thoughts recommendations? OK, it's been a pleasure - any help very much appreciated. Regards Andy. |
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Manager, Design
|
Re: Real-time Motion Video
Compression may be necessary. Currently the limitation for data bitrate is 6Mbps when transmitted over the air.
__________________
![]() ![]() ----------------------------- There are no dumb questions, unless a customer is asking them. Help in the fight against cancer and other serious illnesses.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|