Cia Bib?

**40sondacurb** · 01-14-2006, 05:09 PM

Back in Business?

http://news.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=:...QduAAxb8-oSLLg

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4613108.stm

"A missile strike apparently targeting al-Qaeda's deputy leader in a village.

Ayman al-Zawahiri was not in the village on the border with Afghanistan, Pakistan officials said. But the attack left at least 18 local people dead.

The US military has denied knowledge of the attack, which US media reported had been carried out by the CIA."

thoughts? Is it about time, or are these moves too crude and will just piss people off?

~~GiancarloC~~ · 01-14-2006, 05:13 PM

This was done on valid information... and was done on credible basis.

**Grove** · 01-14-2006, 05:39 PM

I guess the CIA must have screwed up. The soldiers follow orders. Someone must have given the order to attack. If it was not the CIA it was another agency, I presume.

Although, the intelligence would have come through the CIA.

~~GiancarloC~~ · 01-14-2006, 06:18 PM

I think it was moreso the Pakistanis that screwed up and fed old information (I do believe the building was used by terrorists at one point). The Pakistanis said it was a 50/50 chance.. and I'm wondering why they would say that if it was themselves who provided the intelligence.

**40sondacurb** · 01-14-2006, 06:42 PM

I have no doubt they did, and I have no doubt they got something in return, but it would not be wise on their part to admit to it.

01-14-2006, 05:09 PM	#1 (permalink)
40sondacurb #64 & #36 BACKBONE Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 5,770 OS: xp	Cia Bib? Back in Business? http://news.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=:...QduAAxb8-oSLLg http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/4613108.stm "A missile strike apparently targeting al-Qaeda's deputy leader in a village. Ayman al-Zawahiri was not in the village on the border with Afghanistan, Pakistan officials said. But the attack left at least 18 local people dead. The US military has denied knowledge of the attack, which US media reported had been carried out by the CIA." thoughts? Is it about time, or are these moves too crude and will just piss people off? __________________ Donate to keep the forum running "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully" -George W. Bush

01-14-2006, 05:39 PM	#3 (permalink)
Grove Professor/Moderator, TSF Design School Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 2,382 OS: Windows XP SP2	I guess the CIA must have screwed up. The soldiers follow orders. Someone must have given the order to attack. If it was not the CIA it was another agency, I presume. Although, the intelligence would have come through the CIA. __________________ ========================================== Get Help: TSF Security Forum \| HijackThis \| MB's 5 Step Process Get Clean: AdAware SE \| Spybot S&D \| CWShredder \| Ewido \| CleanUp! Get Protected: SpywareBlaster \| SpywareGuard \| Windows Updates \| IE-SpyAd If TSF has helped you, please consider making a donation to help keep the board running.

01-14-2006, 06:42 PM	#5 (permalink)
40sondacurb #64 & #36 BACKBONE Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 5,770 OS: xp	I have no doubt they did, and I have no doubt they got something in return, but it would not be wise on their part to admit to it. __________________ Donate to keep the forum running "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully" -George W. Bush

01-14-2006, 05:13 PM	#2 (permalink)
~~GiancarloC~~ Register user Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: LoS aNgElEs Posts: 315 OS: Win2000Pro	This was done on valid information... and was done on credible basis.

01-14-2006, 06:18 PM	#4 (permalink)
~~GiancarloC~~ Register user Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: LoS aNgElEs Posts: 315 OS: Win2000Pro	I think it was moreso the Pakistanis that screwed up and fed old information (I do believe the building was used by terrorists at one point). The Pakistanis said it was a 50/50 chance.. and I'm wondering why they would say that if it was themselves who provided the intelligence.