yustr

President Bush, today, gave a major speach where he defended his war in Iraq. Here's a LINK to the entire text.

Some things jumped out for me>

Bush: “Many militants are part of global borderless terrorist organizations like Al Qaida, …
… the militant network wants to use the vacuum created by an American retreat to gain control of a country, a base from which to launch attacks and conduct their war against non-radical Muslim governments."

Weird logic: A+B = strawberries. Why does a “global borderless” group want to “gain control of a country”?

Bush: “Some have also argued that extremism has been strengthened by the actions of our coalition in Iraq, claiming that our presence in that country has somehow caused or triggered the rage of radicals...

I would remind them that we were not in Iraq on September the 11th, 2001, and Al Qaida attacked us anyway.“

I'd remind Mr. Bush that Al Qaida was not in Iraq on September 11, 2001 either.


Bush asks: “Would the United States and other free nations be more safe or less safe with Zarqawi and bin Laden in control of Iraq, its people and its resources?”

The better question would be: Are the United States and other free nations more safe or less safe now than before Bush invaded Iraq?

Bush: "And the civilized world knows very well that other fanatics in history, from Hitler to Stalin to Pol Pot, consumed whole nations in war and genocide before leaving the stage of history."

Zarqawi on the scale of these guys – wow.

__________________


I'm helping in the fight against Cancer, YOU CAN TOO find out how; CLICK HERE


I didn't mean to say it. But I meant what I said. J. McMurtry