![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Manager, The Relaxation Room/Analyst, Security Team
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,620
OS: xp
|
Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...QLpZk&refer=us
__________________
![]() TSF has outgrown its server, again. Please help ![]() "Gutta cavat lapidem, non vi sed saepe cadendo" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 2,220
OS: Vista Business
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
This is rediculas, there are warnings all over tasers and in the manuals. Oh well... can't account for the stupidity of juries
__________________
Marge: We wouldn't be in this trouble if you'd just paid the heating bill! Homer: I thought global warming would take care of it! Al Gore can't do anything right! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Mentor Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,127
OS: XP, Vista
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
Wonder if he would have survived if they used a .45 instead of the Taser???
__________________
Rich ![]() MemTest86 | BIOS | BenchTest | Spyware Cleaning | How to Post a Screen shot | PC running slow |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
OS: Windows XP Pro
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
It will be interesting to see what the appeals court says about this, but possibly over looked in the third paragraph of the Bloomberg article is the information that Taser has been involved in at least 11 lawsuits involving training accidents with law enforcement personnel. Frankly, this really has to make you question the effectiveness of Taser's safety warnings.
Personally, I think Taser downplays the hazards of their product, and would like everyone to believe it's perfectly safe under any conditions. The disclaimers are in the fine print, I expect. Here's a video about why you should buy a Taser for your home. Don't get me wrong, I have no compunction about killing anyone threatening me or my family. But I think Taser has misrepresented their product, and their insistence that the weapon is non-lethal is almost a guarantee that it will be abused.
__________________
Sweet! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Mentor
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
what is it, 50,000 volts going through you when shot with a taser. I rather take a chance with that than being pop with a glock. Like anything else, it can be abused and be used to tortured but its still gives you a better chance of living without permanent injury.
I think all of these cases should be thrown out of court since it would never had happened if the person would have behaved him/herself.
__________________
![]() Do not feed the trolls. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
OS: Windows XP Pro
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
So, I guess this includes the 11 cases involving law officers in training exercises? One of the problems with the way the press reports lawsuits, is that the details don't make good copy, so reports tend to lean to either "isn't this lawsuit frivolous" or "Big Business get what's coming" extremes. Frankly, sobeit, your assumption that anyone who gets tazed is automatically guilty and wouldn't have been zapped unless they had it coming is naive, and ignores the issue of why anyone has to zapped repeatedly.
__________________
Sweet! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Manager, The Conversation Pit/Analyst, Security Team
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
I believe that cops are held to the same shooting standards whether shooting a gun or Taser. They have to have some probable cause.
__________________
Scarlet and Gray in L.A. 9/13/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Mentor
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
Quote:
As far as being zapped repeatedly, you did not read my whole message. I did state that it is sometimes abused. And yes sometimes a person has to be zapped several times because of drugs or their inability to follow instructions. One more thing, just because my opinion is different than yours dont mean its a naive one. Yours could be just as naive.
__________________
![]() Do not feed the trolls. Last edited by sobeit : 06-10-2008 at 07:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 2,220
OS: Vista Business
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
Quote:
From what I know here in WA the use of force with the tasers are really low. If the individual being told what to do by the police say "no" it is non-compliance and they can taze you. Why do people get upset with the cop when he/she tases someone because they were being non-compliant?
__________________
Marge: We wouldn't be in this trouble if you'd just paid the heating bill! Homer: I thought global warming would take care of it! Al Gore can't do anything right! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
TSF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 745
OS: Windows XP Pro
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
Drew, I don't really see the issue as being about failing to comply with a lawful order from law enforcement personnel; I see it in terms of a weapon that has an increased potential for abuse precisely because it is "non-lethal". I think Taser does indeed downplay the potential risks of the weapon. Certainly, a suspect is less likely to die from being tazed than shot, and the officer is a lot safer zapping a suspect than getting in close with a nightstick, but that isn't the same thing as saying that Taser has done a thorough job of explaining the potential lethality of the weapon.
sobeit, you still aren't addressing the issue of why 11 lawsuits have been filed against Taser by law enforcement officers involved in training accidents. Certainly, you would think that these were people who knew the job was dangerous when they took it. So why the suits? Taser settled these out of court, so aren't you just a bit curious about what you're not hearing? Finally, you seem to view all cops as selfless Paladins of Justice who could never be corrupt, or maybe just plain frightened people who might over-react and let their professionalism slip for a second. So, yeah, I going to stick with my assertion that you views are naive. The word you're actually looking for to describe mine, though, would be either "cynical" or "realistic" depending on your viewpoint.
__________________
Sweet! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Mentor Hardware Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,127
OS: XP, Vista
|
Re: Taser Loses 1st Product-Liability Suit; Jury Awards $6 Million
Cops accidentally discharge their weapons all the time . . why should an accident with a Taser be a supprise?
__________________
Rich ![]() MemTest86 | BIOS | BenchTest | Spyware Cleaning | How to Post a Screen shot | PC running slow |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|