TurboTech2222

Global White Population to Plummet to Single Digit—Black Population to Double

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom
As a percentage of world inhabitants, the white population will plummet to a single digit (9.76%) by 2060 from a high-water mark of 27.98% in 1950.

Using 2010 as the base reference, the big gainer in the population derby will be blacks or sub-Sahara Africans. This group will expand almost 133% to 2.7 billion by 2060. By the middle of this century blacks will represent 25.38% of world population, which is up dramatically from the 8.97% they recorded in 1950.

The other groups measured in the study were the Central Asians (Indians), East Asians (Chinese and Japanese), the Southeast Asians, Arabic (North Africa and the Middle East), and Amerindian-Mestizo (Mexican and Central America). All these groups will experience a population growth. The Chinese/Japanese and Indians will trade rankings and the relative global presence of the other groups will remain more or less constant.

The big population story of the 21st Century is shaping up to be the status reversal of whites and blacks and the Indian baby boom. A side bar will be the single digit minority role that whites will assume. Of the 7 population groups studied, only whites are projected to sustain an absolute decline in numbers.

In 1950 whites and blacks were respectively 27.98% and 8.97% of world population. By 2060 these figures will almost reverse as blacks surge to 25.38% and whites shrink to 9.76%. From 2010 the white population will decline while blacks will add 1.2 billion to their numbers. In this time frame the the Indian subcontinent will gain 1.2 billion people. These groups and their governments will be looking for elbow room, and the diminished presence of whites in Europe, and especially in the relatively wide open spaces North America, will provide such an opportunity. Specifically, countries like Canada, the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Russia can expect to be pressured to accept collectively hundreds of millions of refugees from India, and sub-Sahara Africa.

(Click on link below to get your free copy of the report)

http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.o...p?b=population

sobeit

its all statistics...it could change at anytime. As I was taught in stats class, stats can be made to show any thing you want it to show.

__________________


Do not feed the trolls.

EnglishPaul

A lot can change: Birth control; pandemics; natural disasters, esp. famine; wars.

It seems to me that it is not that there isn't enough land, it is that there either isn't the food capacity or the land isn't habitable. And given resources, I believe both are fixable.
But even if there is migration it will either be positive or be self limiting: either more people will do more jobs and be beneficial, or people will end up in poor conditions and will leave with others not following.

sobeit

lets not forget 2012 when the world as we know it will end.

__________________


Do not feed the trolls.

EnglishPaul

What; because London hosts the Olympics?

40sondacurb

no because your logo is the mark of the beast.

__________________


Donate to keep the forum running

"I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully"
-George W. Bush

EnglishPaul

sobeit

you better believe it, remember this is the town had that millennium dome. who knows what they will do to the olympics.

__________________


Do not feed the trolls.

Chode

The world is getting more "colorful"? So what? It's Springtime in Texas and everyone I know (including my own stuck-indoors self) is getting darker every day. Most of the world isn't "white" now, in your narrow definition of the term, TurboTech, even if you include many people (like most of India) that are Caucasian. How effing trivial can you get! I worry a lot more about finding the 4 Grand for my 13-year old's braces!

Is there actually a point to your post that goes beyond some vague alarmist position that we should fear the Dark? Are IQ's about to drop dramatically 'cause of all dem darkies? Got news for you, I have some family with Native American blood that are just about as dark as anyone you can find, and it doesn't seem to be a handicap. Better my daughters should marry black men than pinheads, Zippy.

__________________
Sweet!

EnglishPaul

off topic: Do braces really cost 4 grand? I should have been a dentist!

sobeit

better off topic than resort to name calling out of ignorance

__________________


Do not feed the trolls.

Chode

Yessir, EP, I have to cough up slightly over 4 thou for my kiddo's dental makeover. And actually, sobeit, racist BS is racist BS no matter how you color it. Read about the organization responsible for this trash report.

__________________
Sweet!

Chode

Here's a video about NPI's views that I'm sure many of you will find enlightening.

__________________
Sweet!

sobeit

Just because you do not want to believe in the report dont mean its wrong. Just because you do not believe in that organization dont mean its wrong. IMO, its usually a racist who is claiming racism when it comes to facts.

__________________


Do not feed the trolls.

Chode

I had to think a long, long time before replying to your post because it was really hard for me to believe that you could have gone on record saying anything so perfectly stupid, but I re-read it over and over, and there it was: an embarrassing descent into the most rancid depths of illogical "thought" (have to use the term loosely here, I'm afraid) that I've seen in quite a while.

What constitutes "Racism" or a "Racist" attitude? Here's a definition from Merriam -Webster's online dictionary:


Main Entry:
rac·ism Listen to the pronunciation of racism
Pronunciation:
\ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function:
noun
Date:
1933

1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

You should note that this term is scientifically neutral. A belief that race is the primary determinant, etc. does not make your viewpoint necessarily right or wrong, anymore than being a "Creationist" or an "Evolutionist" does. It simply defines a set of criteria for your beliefs.

So what are my problems with this report? Well, first of all, it was paid for by a white supremacist organization. The belief that White people are inherently superior to other populations makes them by definition "racist". Since I oppose this view, I'm by definition not a racist.

Next, the report wants to use the term "black" to describe racial groupings (which tend to be tenuous by most definitions) to include all dark-skinned people whether they are Native American, Indian, Melanesian, or whatever. By the way, just how dark do you have to be before you're black? Is there a color chart?

Finally, the source of the report actually does have to be taken into consideration. NPI has an axe to grind. They would like us to believe that "black" people are inferior to a relatively small group that includes Northern Europeans and some Northern Asians. They offer historically twisted evidence of "progress" and IQ tests that really only measure cultural differences as evidence for their beliefs.

But you know what; I can't prove my beliefs. I believe that there are no significant differences in intelligence between human populations, and it's logically impossible to prove a negative. Sobeit, I really look forward to more posts from you supporting the view that Whites are better, smarter, whatever, than the rest of mankind.

__________________
Sweet!

thomsonmg2000