![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Welcome
to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues
have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft,
Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your
problem solved is as easy as: 1. Registering for a free account 2. Asking your question 3. Receiving an answer Registered members: * See fewer ads. * And much more..
|
| Want to know how to post a question? click here | Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps |
|
|||||||
| Automotive Support Fixing your Automobile...from Minis to Semis! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2
OS: XP
|
2001 S-10 gas mileage
I have a 2001 Chevy S-10 2WD with 4.3 and 4L60E tranny. Prior to going to 10% ethanol, I used to get around 22.5 MPG. Now the best I can get is no more than 19.5 MPG. Believe me, with gas prices at over $3.50/gallon, a 3 MPG loss is noticeable. The truck currently has 92,000 miles on it and is in excellent running condition and has been very well maintained. I have been running Mobil oil in it for about 4 years now. Tires are kept inflated to 35 PSI. What can I do to recover some gas mileage? It currently has 3.42 gears. I am very good at doing rearend work and have contemplated changing the rearend gear ratio. Will a ratio change to 3.23 or 3.08 make a noticeable difference? Or will it put the engine out of it's torque range and actually hurt MPG? The legal highway speed limit here is 50 MPH. I drive as though there's an egg under my right foot.
|
|
|
|
| Important Information |
|
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free. Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
TSF Gearhead
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Brisbane Australia.
Posts: 592
OS: All Systems, mainly Linux
|
Re: 2001 S-10 gas mileage
Good Evening stenner, the problem with trucks is often dependent on their application as far as efficiency is concerned, in essence it takes X amount of energy to to a specific amount of work, if the vehicle were predominantly on highway for long level runs there could be benefit but could produce losses under loads in hilly places so it is a gamble to take to see if there might be any benefit.
As far as losses using ethanol blends is concerned that is pretty normal, those blended fuels do not have equivalent energy content. More often the blended fuels may not be as specified as to the ratio of ethanol etc. I would be inclined to leave it alone. But nothing ventured nothing gained. Others will have different ideas. Cheers, qldit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 205
OS: XP
|
Re: 2001 S-10 gas mileage
stenner i too have tried the ethanol, i quickly stopped useing it because of my fuel mileage dropped also.
as far as the rear end ratio, my 98 s10 had the 3.08 and i got 19mpg almost all the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2
OS: XP
|
Re: 2001 S-10 gas mileage
Hey thanks for your replies guys. I know that gas watered down with ethanol makes less BTU's than straight gas. Everything they sell here is 10% ethanol. You can't get straight gas anymore. What a bummer. Thats all part of Uncle Sam's plan to make us less dependent on the Arabs. Doesn't make sense. they water the gas down with ethanol, our gas mileage goes out the window so we use more gas. Go figure.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|