Welcome to Tech Support Forum home to more then 136,000 problems solved. Issues have included: Spyware, Malware, Virus Issues, Windows, Microsoft, Linux, Networking, Security, Hardware, and Gaming Getting your problem solved is as easy as:
1. Registering for a free account
2. Asking your question
3. Receiving an answer

Registered members:
* Get free support
* Communicate privately with other members (PM).
* Removal of this message
* See fewer ads.
* And much more..

 



Want to know how to post a question? click here Having problems with spyware and pop-ups? First Steps
Go Back   Tech Support Forum > Alternative Computing > Linux Support
User Name
Password
Site Map Register Donate Rules Blogs Mark Forums Read


Linux Support Linux - Operating Systems and Applications Support

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-06-2005, 09:59 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 80
OS: FreeBSD x 2, XP Pro


natd (NAT and IPFW?) on one NIC

I actually have a FreeBSD system, but the issue should be the same as in Linux.

I have a broadband connection with a simple router that serves 4 hard IPs inside (3 FreeBSD and one MacOS servers). I would like to set up an anonymous NAT subnet (on the same Ethernet LAN) served by one of the UNIX servers, so several other workstations can make outgoing connections to the Internet.

I would set the anonymous NAT subnet workstations to gateway to the server, and then have the server redirect the packets through natd and back out the same NIC to the server's gateway, which is the actual router.

I've set up natd on machines with 2 NICs before, and it uses an IPFW rule to redirect LAN packets to natd. My problem is, with one NIC, none of the normal IPFW/natd setup documentation seems to apply; it all depends on IPFW connecting one NIC to another. I've even set up the anonymous subnet by aliasing an anonymous IP address on the server NIC. I can talk to the server from the anonymous workstations, but I need to get them connected to the Internet. IPFW seems to work on the basis of interfaces (NICs), not IP numbers.

Is this possible with a single NIC? Any ideas? Should I ask this question in Networking or Protocols? I'm trying it here, because those other topics seem full of Windows people.

- The Inspector
InspectorGadget is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Important Information
Join the #1 Tech Support Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

TechSupportForum.com is a leading support website for your computer needs. We offer free, friendly and personalized computer support. Why pay to have your computer fixed when you can do it for free.

Join TechSupportforum.com Today - Click Here

Old 09-08-2005, 06:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
Manager
 
shuuhen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 986
OS: Mac OS 9.1, Mac OS X 10.5.8, WinXP Pro, FreeBSD 6.0, Gentoo Linux

My System

If you have eth0 assigned, I think you just need to assign an address to eth0:1, then you should able to set up NAT or IP forwarding the same way you would with two NICs. It's been a while since I've done this in Linux, so I might be remembering wrong...
shuuhen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:54 AM.



Copyright 2001 - 2009, Tech Support Forum
Home Tips Plus | Outdoor Basecamp | Automotive Support Forum

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85