Tech Support Forum - View Single Post

Tumbleweed36 · 07-16-2007, 06:25 AM

MaverickUK has given you some words of wisdom that you should heed. Performance vs. cost is a very important consideration for most of us and i don't see a need to raise the cost of your usage by purchasing the 640.....It is IMHO very questionable what good going to the 640 would actually do for you in actual performance. The only upside of 640 is bragging rights (I have a badder rig than you do) and not performance vs. cost.

07-16-2007, 06:25 AM	#3 (permalink)
Tumbleweed36 Asst Manager Hardware Join Date: May 2005 Location: USA Posts: 19,652 OS: XP Professional	Re: 8800 320MB vs 8800 640 MB MaverickUK has given you some words of wisdom that you should heed. Performance vs. cost is a very important consideration for most of us and i don't see a need to raise the cost of your usage by purchasing the 640.....It is IMHO very questionable what good going to the 640 would actually do for you in actual performance. The only upside of 640 is bragging rights (I have a badder rig than you do) and not performance vs. cost. __________________ ---------- I don't receive email notifications of replies to subscribed threads. (Internet provider policy) Therefore, if I don't respond to your post within 24 hours, please send me a reminder PM and include the link to your thread.