Tech Support Forum - View Single Post

System Specs

CPU: Pentium D 940 3.20GHZ <> Pentium 4 3.00GHZ <> Celeron 2.26GHZ <> Athlon XP 2600+ <> Athlopn 2000+

Mainboard: ASUS P5KC <> ASUS P4S800D-X <> ASUS P4SD-LA <> ASUS A7N8X <> None

Memory: 1GB RAM <> 1GB RAM <> 512MB RAM <> 256MB RAM <> 256MB

Hard Drive: WD SATAII 250GB <> WD SATAII 160GB <> Maxtor 160GB <> None yet. <> None

Video: TNT2 16MB PCI <> Radeon 9600Pro 256MB <> Geforce 6200 <> Geforce FX 5200 <> Geforce 2 MX 400

Sound: Onboard 8CH Realtek HD <> SB Live! 5.1 <> AudioPCI <> Onboard Nvidia <> Onboard

CD Rom: Memorex Lightscrive <> Forgoten model DVD Burner <> LG DVD Burner <> LG DVD Burner <> LG DVD Burner

Power Supply: Coolmaster 400W < OKIA 500W <> AOpen 300W <> Antec 400W <> HIPRO 250W

Printer: None

OS: Windows XP Pro<> Windows XP Pro <> Ubuntu 7.04 <> Windows XP <> Windows

10-06-2006, 05:33 AM	#4 (permalink)
lhuser Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 52 OS: My modified Windows XP My System	To what I see, the AMD Athlon 64 system beats the other because the dual-core CPUs are running in compatible with it. They're really meant for an AM2, so, your AMD athlon has better efficiency than the Duual-Core. It's llike that.