Tech Support Forum - View Single Post - Networks continue to ignore NY Times' military analyst story

Tumbleweed36 · 04-30-2008, 05:36 PM

I think you can tie it directly to the fact that the NYT is losing subscribers like rats off a sinking ship. They have done so much damage by biased reporting for the left, that even if it is a true story (which I don't doubt), no one wants to be on the same boat as the NYT because of their lack of creditability. That includes subscribers and other news sources that don't want to be on the slide with the NYT.

Does that make it right for others to ignore it?....nope, does not. However, it is also not correct that when the NYT does a "fake" or unresearched story that is left leaning like they constantly do and get caught, the admission of failure is buried in the twenty-fifth page after they splashed the original story all over the front page. Who the heck wants to associate with a news source that does that? Not me, said I.

04-30-2008, 05:36 PM	#4 (permalink)
Tumbleweed36 Asst Manager Hardware Join Date: May 2005 Location: USA Posts: 12,812 OS: XP Professional	Re: Networks continue to ignore NY Times' military analyst story I think you can tie it directly to the fact that the NYT is losing subscribers like rats off a sinking ship. They have done so much damage by biased reporting for the left, that even if it is a true story (which I don't doubt), no one wants to be on the same boat as the NYT because of their lack of creditability. That includes subscribers and other news sources that don't want to be on the slide with the NYT. Does that make it right for others to ignore it?....nope, does not. However, it is also not correct that when the NYT does a "fake" or unresearched story that is left leaning like they constantly do and get caught, the admission of failure is buried in the twenty-fifth page after they splashed the original story all over the front page. Who the heck wants to associate with a news source that does that? Not me, said I. __________________ ----------